A fundraising assembly featuring dogs doing tricks spurred months of debate in a southern California community after a mother protested excluding those students who hadn't sold anything.

01/22/2014

March 2008

A fundraising assembly featuring dogs doing tricks spurred months of debate in a southern California community about who should be allowed to attend the events.

Elizabeth Swenke, whose child attends Ronald Reagan Elementary in Wildomar, spoke up when she learned that only students who participated in a PTA fundraiser could attend the event. She argued that some students would be left out because their parents could not afford to buy products or could not accompany their children to sell items to neighbors.

Swenke asked the principal and the PTA to either include all students or hold the event after school hours; however, the assembly was held one morning during school only for students who sold at least one item in the fundraiser.

“I don’t see what you are gaining by excluding kids,” Swenke told the North County Times newspaper. “Teaching 5-year-olds that life isn’t fair, is that what PTA fundraising is all about?”

Several Reagan Elementary PTA members countered that the assemblies are needed to motivate students to raise money for the school and that all students benefit from the funds raised.

Swenke later brought the issue to the attention of Lake Elsinore Unified School District officials. The board decided in January to leave the current policy in place, allowing principals and PTA leaders at each school to make the determination.

Comments   

# Jeff Meisnere 2008-06-05 08:37
My kids have friends that go to camp in the summertime and also take trips to really nice places. When my kids ask why we do not do those things, I have to tell them that we do not have the money. This is life.

I do not think that their is a magic year to welcome them to the life of money. Some have it and some do not.

Some kids are given a chance to be in gifted programs at school. Is that fair? Maybe those kids invited have parents that read to them alot. They have more time.

I guess we should get rid of those programs as well.

The parents complaining about this, are the same parents who beleive that every kid should get a trophy at the end of the soccer season. Why, because we are all winners. No we are not. Some work harder and some are just lucky enough to have parents that make more money.

Welcome to LIFE!!!!
# Arleen McClung 2008-09-11 02:24
They are kids. Rewards for fundraisers should be given in a way that don't single the kids out. Like a pizza party for the class that sells the most. That way kids aren't singled out. By the way I don't think trophies have to go to all the kids at soccer. There's a difference between being more or less talented than having more or less money. Having more money doesn't make you a better person. But having more athletic ability does make you a better soccer player. Let the kids be kids. There's plenty of time for real life later.
By the way, has your kid had to be the one missing the school party?
# Arleen 2008-09-11 02:25
oops. I meant doesn't single out - not don't.
# David 2009-06-27 00:44
Um...am I missing something here? Aren't we as PTA/PTOs suppose to bring educational opportunities to the families and children by involving parents and the community.

I did not think that we were so focused on fund raising that we hurt the very children we are trying to help by excluding them.

Nope, don't believe that every kid should get a trophy, but the rewards should be inherent to the fund raising program...or none at all.
# katabe 2010-04-27 14:24
Why don't we just give every kid an A+ so we don't hurt anyone's feelings?

Now that sounds fair?

Add comment

Security code
Refresh

^ Top