Welcome to the Message Boards Join the conversation! No soliciting or ads, please. Registration is not required but encouraged to get the most out of our community features.
Hi One and Done Mama,
I admit I had to look up your final reference , and no, you are correct that if it's in the bylaws, it's what should have been happening. That said, after so long and under the circumstances, you *could* amend the bylaws. If a formal audit isn't want people want to do, you could relax the bylaws a bit to state that there should be a review of the books by someone other than the treasurer or board member annually. Frequently groups do have a non-professional who has some financial expertise (perhaps there's an accountant?) take a look a their books once or twice a year. Offering this solution may be a good compromise.
Best of luck. Liz @ PTO Today
In our ByLaws it specifically states our books are to be audited every single year. I recently found out they have not been audited in well over 10. Crazy I know.
At a recent meeting I called for an audit since as a Member I have the right to do so and it does not have to come to a vote. Long story short, I received loud heat from the Board and from other Members concerning this isue.
Points that were made against me then and later in private were:
-The Treasure's Report that is shared at the beginning of each meeting is an Audit
-"X" amount of years ago the books were reviewed by an accountant so that counts
-The accountant looks at them every year when we file with the IRS
I did not fire back and simply allowed them to raise their voices at me.
From my independant research, I do not belive these actions from the accountant or the Treasurer are the same as an audit. I still want an audit done and I want it to go back at least 5 years (splitting the difference).
I'm not on a witch hunt, nor do I belive anyone is stealing, however the ByLaws which are a legal binding document, state an audit is to be done annually, then it is to be done. Period.
, and no, you are correct that if it's in the bylaws, it's what should have been happening. That said, after so long and under the circumstances, you *could* amend the bylaws. If a formal audit isn't want people want to do, you could relax the bylaws a bit to state that there should be a review of the books by someone other than the treasurer or board member annually. Frequently groups do have a non-professional who has some financial expertise (perhaps there's an accountant?) take a look a their books once or twice a year. Offering this solution may be a good compromise.